Authors
Marc Alspector-Kelly
Western Michigan University
Abstract
In “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology” Carnap drew his famous distinction between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ questions of existence, pronouncing the former meaningful and the latter meaningless. In The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Barry Stroud understands Carnap to be applying the verification criterion of meaningfulness in order to refute Cartesian skepticism. I suggest that Stroud misrepresents both Carnap’s aim and method. Carnap was responding to critics who suggested that his willingness to quantify over abstract entities in his work in semantics violated his commitment to empiricism. He rejected that criticism as presupposing a super-scientific standpoint from which constraints on the admissible domain of entities of science could be delivered. Carnap wanted to insulate science from the imposition of frrst-philosophical metaphysical prejudice, not to defuse scepticism by appeal to verificationism.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy of Mind
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00002.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (11):20-40.
Language, Truth and Logic.[author unknown] - 1937 - Erkenntnis 7 (1):123-125.
Der logische Aufbau der Welt.Rudolf Carnap - 1929 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 8:106-107.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metamathematik versus deskriptive Metalogik.Jesus Padilla-gálvez - 1999 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 57 (1):167-182.
Metaphysics and Idealism in the Aufbau.Alan Richardson - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (1):45-72.
Metamathematik versus deskriptive Metalogik.Jesus Padilla-gálvez - 1999 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 57 (1):167-182.
Stroud's Humean Skepticism.Michael Morales - 2010 - Southwest Philosophical Studies 32:93-97.
Stroud’s Carnap.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):276-302.
Stroud’s Carnap.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):276-302.
The Scope of Deflationism: Reply to Gregory.Paul O’Grady - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):649-653.
On Metaepistemological Scepticism.Duncan Pritchard & Chris Ranalli - 2016 - In Michael Bergmann & Brett Brett Coppenger (eds.), Intellectual Assurance: Essays on Traditional Epistemic Internalism. Oxford University Press.
Das Metaphysische Unternehmen.Sebastian Rödl - 2019 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67 (1):98-117.
Clarke and Stroud on the Plane-Spotters.Brian Ribeiro - 2006 - Southwest Philosophy Review 22 (1):25-32.
Stroud’s Quest for Reality. [REVIEW]Robert J. Fogelin - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):401-407.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-04-29

Total views
7 ( #1,067,128 of 2,504,875 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,875 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes