Carnap and Quine on Empiricism

History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):349 - 364 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the naturalism of Carnap and Quine. I examine Quine's naturalized epistemology and argue that Carnap's naturalism is considerably more attractive

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Empirical equivalence in the Quine-Carnap debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Ontology, analyticity, and meaning : the Quine-Carnap dispute.Scott Soames - 2009 - In David Chalmers, David Manley & Ryan Wasserman (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press. pp. 424--43.
Putting the bite back into 'Two Dogmas'.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Every dogma has its day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Challenges to empiricism.Harold Morick (ed.) - 1972 - Belmont, Calif.,: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Carnap and translational indeterminacy.William H. Berge - 1995 - Synthese 105 (1):115 - 121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
80 (#201,843)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references