Blind Realism: An Essay on Human Knowledge and Natural Science

Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Blind Realism originated in the deeply felt conviction that the widespread acceptance of Gettier-type counterexamples to the classical definition of knowledge rests in a demonstrably erroneous understanding of the nature of human knowledge. In seeking to defend that conviction, Robert F. Almeder offers a fairly detailed and systematic picture of the nature and limits of human factual knowledge

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1992, 1996

ISBN(s)

9780847677092   9780847682805   0847677095   0847682803

DOI

10.2307/2219865
View all bargains

Buy this book

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Blind Realism: An Essay on Human Knowledge and Natural Science.Robert F. Almeder - 1991 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Robert Almeder, Blind Realism: An Essay on Human Knowledge and Natural Science Reviewed by.Douglas Odegard - 1992 - Philosophy in Review 12 (4):227-228.
Blind Realism. [REVIEW]L. S. Carrier - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):715-719.
‘Is’, ‘Ought’ and Moral Realism: The Roles of Nature and Experience in Practical Understanding.Robert Joseph Matava - 2011 - Studies in Christian Ethics 24 (3):311-328.
Classical realism, Freud and human nature in international relations.Robert Schuett - 2010 - History of the Human Sciences 23 (2):21-46.
Epistemology Without History is Blind.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (3):505-524.
Blind realism.Robert Almeder - 1987 - Erkenntnis 26 (1):57 - 101.
Approaches to Realism.Rom Harre - 2012 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (2):23-35.
Essays in critical realism.Durant Drake (ed.) - 1920 - New York,: Gordian Press.
The limits of knowledge and the limits of science.José Bermejo - 2010 - Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio.
Introduction: Indications of the Knowledge Society.Eduardo Portella - 2003 - Diogenes 50 (1):5-6.
Scandalous knowledge: science, truth and the human.Barbara Herrnstein Smith - 2005 - Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Can Cornell Moral Realism Adequately Account for Moral Knowledge?Elizabeth Tropman - 2011 - Theoria 78 (1):26-46.
The source of philosophical questions (realistic philosophy and human knowledge).P. Fotta - 2003 - Filozofia 58 (5):305-323.
Condillac: Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge.Etienne Bonnot de Condillac, John Locke, Thomas Nugent & William Wallace - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Hans Aarsleff.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-06

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2004 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. Routledge. pp. 193.
Keeping Track of the Gettier Problem.Sven Bernecker - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):127-152.
Pragmatism and philosophy of science: A critical survey.Robert Almeder - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (2):171 – 195.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references