Atomism about value

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):312 – 331 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Atomism is defined as the view that the moral value of any object is ultimately determined by simple features whose contribution to the value of an object is always the same, independently of context. A morally fundamental feature, in a given context, is defined as one whose contribution in that context is determined by no other value fact. Three theses are defended, which together entail atomism: (1) All objects have their moral value ultimately in virtue of morally fundamental features; (2) If a feature is morally fundamental, then its contribution is always the same; (3) Morally fundamental features are simple

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Indispensability of Temporal Atomism.Lewis S. Ford - 2009 - Process Studies 38 (2):279-303.
Russell's logical atomism.Kevin C. Klement - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2005.
Is conceptual atomism a plausible theory of concepts?Jack M. C. Kwong - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):413-434.
On judging the moral value of narrative artworks.James Harold - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (2):259–270.
The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1940 - Open Court. Edited by David Pears.
Russell's Logical atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1972 - London,: Fontana. Edited by David Pears & Bertrand Russell.
John Wyclif's atomism.Emily Michael - 2009 - In Christophe Grellard & Aurélien Robert (eds.), Atomism in late medieval philosophy and theology. Boston: Brill. pp. 9--183.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#189,554)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Alm
Lund University

Citations of this work

Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
An argument for agent-neutral value.David Alm - 2007 - Ratio 20 (3):249–263.
Defending Fundamental Requirements of Practical Reason.David Alm - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:77-102.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
The Right and the Good.W. D. Ross - 1930 - Philosophy 6 (22):236-240.
The right and the good.W. Ross - 1932 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 39 (2):11-12.
The Right and the Good.Some Problems in Ethics.W. D. Ross & H. W. B. Joseph - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (19):517-527.

View all 21 references / Add more references