Should we genetically test everyone for haemochromatosis?
Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):209-214 (1999)
Abstract
The increasing availability of DNA-based diagnostic tests has raised issues about whether these should be applied to the population at large in order to identify, treat or prevent a range of diseases. DNA tests raise concerns in the community for several reasons. There is the possibility of stigmatisation and discrimination between those who test positive and those who don't. High-risk individuals may be identified for whom no proven effective intervention is possible, or conversely may test "positive" for a disease that does not eventuate. Controversy concerning prenatal diagnosis and termination of affected pregnancies may arise. Haemochromatosis, however, is a disease that is not only treatable but also preventable if those at high risk are identified presymptomatically. This paper will identify and discuss key issues regarding DNA-based population screening for haemochromatosis, and argue that population-based genetic screening for haemochromatosis should be supported when a number of contentious issues are addressed. In the context of a health system with limited resources haemochromatosis is the paradigm of a disorder where there is an ethical and clinical imperative to encourage presymptomatic DNA testing for all in ethnically relevant communitiesDOI
10.1136/jme.25.2.209
My notes
Similar books and articles
Demanding pure motives for donation: the moral acceptability of blood donations by haemochromatosis patients.G. Pennings - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):69-72.
Taken by surprise: The paradox of the surprise test revisited. [REVIEW]Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses - 1986 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (3):281 - 304.
To test or not to test: A clinical dilemma.David B. Resnik - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
A simple comment regarding the Turing test.Benny Shanon - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (June):249-56.
Does autonomy count in favor of labeling genetically modified food?Kirsten Hansen - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (1):67-76.
Creativity, the Turing test, and the (better) Lovelace test.Selmer Bringsjord, P. Bello & David A. Ferrucci - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):3-27.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-13
Downloads
27 (#433,683)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2010-09-13
Downloads
27 (#433,683)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Predictive Genetic Testing, Autonomy and Responsibility for Future Health.Elisabeth Hildt - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (2):143-153.
Prenatal Diagnosis for "Minor" Genetic Abnormalities is Ethical.Robert J. Boyle & Julian Savulescu - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):60-65.
Demanding pure motives for donation: the moral acceptability of blood donations by haemochromatosis patients.G. Pennings - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):69-72.