Response to “Commentaire sur le texte de Sr Prudence Allen par Jocelyne St-Arnaud”

Dialogue 26 (2):277 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I appreciate very much the thoroughness with which Jocelyne St-Arnaud has analyzed the text of my paper. As she points out, the major source of difference between our approach to the authors under consideration derives from a preference for an ethical and political perspective on her side and a preference for a metaphysical perspective on mine. However, there are a few key points in interpretation that need to be addressed which go beyond this central difference in orientation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Community. [REVIEW]Prudence Allen - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (3):639-640.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
42 (#332,036)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references