Roles and Experiences of Non-scientist Institutional Review Board Members at the National Institutes of Health

, &
IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (5):8 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rethinking Local Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review at State Health Departments: Implications for a Consolidated, Independent Public Health IRB.David Perlman - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):997-1007.
Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health.Alison Wichman & Michele A. Carter - 1991 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1 (3):257-262.
War, Philanthropy, and the National Institute of Hygiene in France.William H. Schneider - 2003 - Minerva 41 (1):1-23.
Country Institutional Context as an Antecedent of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study.Johanne Grosvold & Stephen Brammer - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:395-408.
Bioethics and Its Gatekeepers: Does Institutional Racism Exist in Leading Bioethics Journals? [REVIEW]Subrata Chattopadhyay, Catherine Myser & Raymond De Vries - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):7-9.
The Effects of CEO Trustworthiness on Directors' Monitoring and Resource Provision.Esther B. Del Brio, Toru Yoshikawa, Catherine E. Connelly & Wee Liang Tan - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):155-169.
Exempt Research: Procedures in the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health.Alison Wichman, Deloris Mills & Alan L. Sandler - 1996 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 18 (2):3.
'Through a glass darkly' - the Rockefeller foundation's international health board and soviet public health.S. Solomon - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (3):409-418.
A troubled dance: Doing the work of research ethics review. [REVIEW]Susan A. Tilley - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):91-104.
Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of Phase II and III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Look at Institutional Review Board Members in the Netherlands.A. W. Musschenga, H. E. M. Van Luijn, N. K. Aaronson & R. B. Keus - unknown
The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study.H. E. M. van Luijn - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):170-176.
Developing standards for institutional ethics committees: lessons from the Netherlands.H. H. van der Kloot Meijburg - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (90001):36i-40.
The Dedisciplining of Peer Review.Robert Frodeman & Adam Briggle - 2012 - Minerva 50 (1):3-19.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
9 (#1,219,856)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references