In Iskra Fileva (ed.), Perspectives on Character. Oxford University Press (forthcoming)

Mark Alfano
Macquarie University
Gone are the heady days when Bernard Williams (1993) could get away with saying that “Nietzsche is not a source of philosophical theories” (p. 4). The last two decades have witnessed a flowering of research that aims to interpret, elucidate, and defend Nietzsche’s theories about science, the mind, and morality. This paper is one more blossom in that efflorescence. What I want to argue is that Nietzsche theorized three important and surprising moral psychological insights that have been born out by contemporary empirical psychology. The first Nietzschean insight is the disunity of the self. The second, connected, Nietzschean insight is the primacy of affect. This primacy is expressed by what I have called elsewhere (Alfano 2010, 2013a) the tenacity of the intentional, and what Nietzsche calls the Socratic equation (TI Socrates 4, 10; WP 2:432-3). The third major Nietzschean insight is the social construction of character, which presupposes a wild diversity within the extensions of trait-terms and the dual direction of fit of character trait attributions. This last point is somewhat in tension with the only other published defense of the empirical credentials of Nietzsche’s moral psychology (Knobe & Leiter 2007), so I will make a few remarks about the contrast between my view and theirs.
Keywords Nietzsche  virtue  moral psychology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemic Situationism.Mark Alfano & Abrol Fairweather (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
Constructing and Validating a Scale of Inquisitive Curiosity.Kathryn Iurino, Brian Robinson, Markus Christen, Paul Stey & Mark Alfano - 2018 - In Ilhan Inan, Lani Watson, Dennis Whitcomb & Safiye Yigit (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Curiosity. Rowman & Littlefield.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Max Weber's Nietzschean Conception of Power.Mark E. Warren - 1992 - History of the Human Sciences 5 (3):19-37.
Psychological Identification, Imagination and Psychoanalysis.Louise Braddock - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):639 - 657.
Subjectivity and Human Agency.Theodora Bryan - 1995 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Character and Outlook in the Development of Moral Agency.Richard Kyte - 1994 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Autonomy, and Then.Rüdiger Bittner - 2002 - Philosophical Explorations 5 (3):217 – 228.
Thought and Circumstance.Mark Aronszajn - 1988 - Journal of Semantics 6 (1):271-307.
Kant's Theory of Character.Jean P. Rumsey - 1985 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison


Added to PP index

Total views
438 ( #19,911 of 2,462,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #26,938 of 2,462,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes