Mathematical shortcomings in a simulated universe

The Reasoner 12 (9):71-72 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present an argument that for any computer-simulated civilization we design, the mathematical knowledge recorded by that civilization has one of two limitations. It is untrustworthy, or it is weaker than our own mathematical knowledge. This is paradoxical because it seems that nothing prevents us from building in all sorts of advantages for the inhabitants of said simulation.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Simulated Universe.Brent Silby - 2009 - Philosophy Now 75 (75):28-30.
Yesterday’s Algorithm: Penrose and the Gödel Argument.William Seager - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (9):265-273.
Remarks on Penrose’s “New Argument”.Per Lindström - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (3):231-237.
Mechanism, truth, and Penrose's new argument.Stewart Shapiro - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (1):19-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-04

Downloads
1,176 (#10,072)

6 months
54 (#77,219)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Allen Alexander
Ohio State University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Godel's theorem is a red Herring.I. J. Good - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (February):357-8.

Add more references