Capability Egalitarianism and Moral Selfhood

Ethical Perspectives 10 (1):3-21 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum advocate that a person’s quality of life and equal standing in society should be evaluated in terms of capabilities rather than utility, income or resources.In this article, I critically examine the concept of the person that underpins the capability approach. I argue that the ideal of equality of capability articulates a ‘non-utilitarian’ and ‘non-liberal’ view of the self

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Egalitarianism Reconsidered.Daniel M. Hausman & Matt Sensat Waldren - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):567-586.
Review of Carl Knight, Luck Egalitarianism. [REVIEW]Matthew Lister - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):127-30.
Rights, goals, and capabilities.Martin van Hees - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):247-259.
The Metaphysical Case for Luck Egalitarianism.Carl Knight - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (2):173-189.
Equal Standing in the Global Community.Rekha Nath - 2011 - The Monist 94 (4):593-614.
Respect for Everything.David Schmidtz - 2011 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 14 (2):127-138.
Egalitarianism and Repugnant Conclusions.Thomas Søbirk Petersen - 2003 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 38 (1):115-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
55 (#284,290)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Alexander
Phoenix College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references