Coherence and Argumentation or the Genuine Twin Criterialess Super Criterion

In Aulis Aarnio (ed.), On Coherence Theory of Law. Distribution, Akademibokhandeln I Lund. pp. 41--9 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?Stefano Bertea - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):433-446.
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.
Argumentation mining.Raquel Mochales & Marie-Francine Moens - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (1):1-22.
Leibniz and the Necessity of the Best Possible World.Martin Pickup - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):507-523.
Coherence and the Problem of the Criterion.Robert T. Lehe - 1989 - Idealistic Studies 19 (2):112-120.
Coherence—Criterion and Nature of Truth.Robert Tad Lehe - 1983 - Idealistic Studies 13 (3):177-189.
Korrespondenz und kohärenz.Geo Siegwart - 1993 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (2):303 - 313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
3 (#1,613,047)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references