Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game

, , , &
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fnhum.2013.00312

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game.Johanna Alexopoulos, Daniela M. Pfabigan, Claus Lamm, Herbert Bauer & Florian Ph S. Fischmeister - 2012 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.
Paradigmatic experiments: The ultimatum game from testing to measurement device.Francesco Guala - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):658-669.
Towards Closed-World Reasoning in Games - Ultimatum Game Revisited.Y. Q. Xue - unknown
An experimental study of the generosity game.Werner Güth, M. Vittoria Levati & Matteo Ploner - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (1):51-63.
How to play the ultimatum game: An engineering approach to metanormativity.Benoit Hardy-Vallée & Paul Thagard - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (2):173 – 192.
Kinship, Family, and Gender Effects in the Ultimatum Game.Shane J. Macfarlan & Robert J. Quinlan - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (3):294-309.
Explaining fairness in complex environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.
Coevolution of role preference and fairness in the ultimatum game.Genki Ichinose - 2013 - Complexity 18 (1):56-64.
The endogenous nature of the measurement of social preferences.John Smith - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (2):235-256.
What does the ultimatum game mean in the real world?Randolph C. Grace & Simon Kemp - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):824-825.
No Switchbacks: Rethinking Aspiration-Based Dynamics in the Ultimatum Game. [REVIEW]Jeffrey Carpenter & Peter Hans Matthews - 2005 - Theory and Decision 58 (4):351-385.
Love is not enough: Other-regarding preferences cannot explain payoff dominance in game theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):22-23.
Belief in God: A game-theoretic paradox. [REVIEW]Steven J. Brams - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (3):121 - 129.
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game.Romina Boarini, Jean-François Laslier & Stéphane Robin - 2009 - Theory and Decision 67 (4):341-373.
On social utility payoffs in games: a methodological comparison between Behavioural and Rational Game Theory. [REVIEW]Luca Zarri - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):587-598.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
29 (#516,369)

6 months
6 (#403,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emotion Explained.Edmund T. Rolls - 2007 - Oxford University Press.

Add more references