Reason and Religion in Clarissa: Samual Richardson and “The Famous Mr. Norris, of Bemerton.” By E. Derek Taylor

The European Legacy 17 (6):835-835 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/10848770.2012.716201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The philosophy of John Norris of Bemerton: (1657-1712).Richard Acworth - 1979 - New York: G. Olms.
Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. By Catherine Wilson and Letters Concerning the Love of God. By Mary Astell and John Norris. Edited by E. Derek Taylor and Melvyn New. [REVIEW]Alastair Hamilton - 2010 - Heythrop Journal 51 (1):146-147.
The philosophy of John Norris.W. J. Mander (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
'The Force of Language, and the Sweets of Love': Eliza Haywood and the Erotics of Reading in Samuel Richardson's Clarissa.Kate Williams - 2004 - Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 23:309.
Hilary Putnam: realism, reason, and the uses of uncertainty.Christopher Norris - 2002 - New York: Distributed in the U.S. by Palgrave.
On the utility of scale‐free networks.Vic Norris & Derek Raine - 2006 - Bioessays 28 (5):563-564.
Reason and emotion.John Macmurray - 1935 - London,: D. Appleton-Century company.
The Life of Reason.George Santayana - 1905 - New York,: Prometheus Books.
Science, reason & religion.Derek Stanesby - 1985 - New York: Routledge.
Naturalistic explanations of religion are as old as Xenophanes (570–480bc). The most famous are probably those of Feuerbach, Marx, and Freud. I must confess that I don't find these three famous explanations of religion very interesting. 1 Large parts of them are unintelligible (this is particularly true of Feuerbach's writings on religion) and the parts that are intelligible are vague and untestable (Feuerbach and Freud), or else they demand allegiance to some very comprehensive theory that has been tried and found wanting on grounds unrelated to religion (Marx's theory of the dialectics of history and Freud's psychology). [REVIEW]Peter van Inwagen - 2009 - In Jeffrey Schloss & Michael J. Murray (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
27 (#554,860)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references