Diametros 51:137-152 (2017)

Authors
Andreas Albertsen
Aarhus University
Abstract
In the effort to address the persistent organ shortage it is sometimes suggested that we should incentivize people to sign up as organ donors. One way of doing so is to give priority in the allocation of organs to those who are themselves registered as donors. Israel introduced such a scheme recently and the preliminary reports indicate increased donation rates. How should we evaluate such initiatives from an ethical perspective? Luck egalitarianism, a responsibility-sensitive approach to distributive justice, provides one possible justification: Those who decide against being organ donors limit the health care resources available to others. As such, a priority rule can be justified by a luck egalitarian approach to distributive justice. Furthermore, a priority rule inspired by luck egalitarianism is well equipped to avoid prominent criticisms of such a procurement system. Luck egalitarianism provides us with reaons to exempt people who are not responsible for their inability to donate from receiving lower priority, provide sufficient information about donation, and mitigate social and natural circumstances affecting people’s choice to donate.
Keywords luck egalitarianism  organ shortage  reciprocity  Israel  distributive justice  incentive to organ donation  priority to organ donors  equal access  personal responsibility  organ donation  priority rule
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.13153/diam.51.2017.1035
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

7. Luck Egalitarian Justice in Health.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - In Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton University Press. pp. 98-110.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Earning Points for Moral Behavior: Organ Allocation Based on Reciprocity.An Ravelingien & André Krom - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):73-83.
Causal Responsibility and Rationing in Medicine.Frank Dietrich - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (1):113-131.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
The Problem of Organ Donation.Havi Carel - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 42:43-49.
The Problem of Organ Donation.Havi Carel - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 42 (3rd qu):43-49.
The Subtle Politics of Organ Donation: A Proposal.S. Eaton - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (3):166-170.
Trust and the Duty of Organ Donation.Ben Almassi - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):275-283.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-03-27

Total views
53 ( #217,732 of 2,533,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #164,143 of 2,533,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes