Patents, Innovation, and Privatization: Commentary on: “Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective”

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):777-781 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The framers of the U.S. Constitution believed that intellectual property rights were crucial to scientific advancement. Yet, the framers also recognized the need to balance innovation, privatization, and public use. The courts’ expansion of patent protection for biotechnology innovations in the last 30 years raises the question whether the patent system effectively balances these concerns. While the question is not new, only through a thorough and thoughtful examination of these issues can the current system be evaluated. It is then a policy decision for Congress if any change is necessary

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Surgical patents and patients — the ethical dilemmas.Tadeusz Tołłoczko - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):61-69.
Can drug patents be morally justified?Sigrid Sterckx - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (1):81-92.
Patents.Justine Pila - 2009 - In Cane & Conaghan (ed.), The New Oxford Companion to Law.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-18

Downloads
48 (#324,723)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Add more references