Analyse & Kritik 25 (1):101-117 (2003)
AbstractBayesianism is the predominant philosophy of science in North-America, the most important school of statistics world-wide, and the general version of the rational-choice approach in the social sciences. Although often rejected as a theory of actual behavior, it is still the benchmark case of perfect rationality. The paper reviews the development of Bayesianism in philosophy, statistics and decision making and questions its status as an account of perfect rationality. Bayesians, who otherwise are squarely in the empiricist camp, invoke a priori reasoning when they recommend Bayesian methods - a recommendation that is not justified by their own standards.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Underdetermination, Model-Ensembles and Surprises: On the Epistemology of Scenario-Analysis in Climatology.Gregor Betz - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (1):3-21.
Similar books and articles
Decision Theory and the Rationality of Further Deliberation.Igor Douven - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):303-328.
An Evolutionary Perspective on Information Processing.Peter C. Trimmer & Alasdair I. Houston - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (2):312-330.
Confirmation in the Cognitive Sciences: The Problematic Case of Bayesian Models. [REVIEW]Frederick Eberhardt & David Danks - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (3):389-410.
Biting the Bayesian Bullet: Zeckhauser's Problem.Richard Jeffrey - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):117-122.
Rationality in Medical Decision Making: A Review of the Literature on Doctors' Decision‐Making Biases. [REVIEW]Brian H. Bornstein & A. Christine Emler - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):97-107.
Analogy in Decision-Making, Social Interaction, and Emergent Rationality.Boicho Kokinov - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):167-168.
Thinking About Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision Making.John L. Pollock - 2006 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, Usa.
Battle in the Planning Office: Field Experts Versus Normative Statisticians.Marcel Boumans - 2008 - Social Epistemology 22 (4):389 – 404.
Adaptive Versus Veridical Decision Making and the Frontal Lobes.Elkhonon Goldberg & Kenneth Podell - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (3):364-377.
The Rationality of Different Kinds of Intuitive Decision Processes.Marc Jekel, Andreas Glöckner, Susann Fiedler & Arndt Bröder - 2012 - Synthese 189 (S1):147-160.
A Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Human Decision‐Making on an Optimal Stopping Problem.Michael D. Lee - 2006 - Cognitive Science 30 (3):1-26.
A Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Approach to Searching and Stopping in Multi-Attribute Judgment.Don van Ravenzwaaij, Chris P. Moore, Michael D. Lee & Ben R. Newell - 2014 - Cognitive Science 38 (7):1384-1405.