- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Noise induced hearing loss: Building an application using the ANGELIC methodology
Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Stuart Whittle, Rob Williams & Catriona Wolfenden
Argument and Computation 10 (1):5-22 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Willingness to pay for a hearing aid: comparing the payment scale and open‐ended question.Janneke P. C. Grutters, Lucien J. C. Anteunis, Michelene N. Chenault & Manuela A. Joore - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):91-96.
Concepts and Significance of Noise in Acoustics: Before and after the Great War.Roland Wittje - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (1):7-28.
The survival attractor in the sensory functions: The example of hearing.Isabelle Sendowski & Jacques Viret - 2004 - Acta Biotheoretica 52 (4):401-414.
Accommodating change.Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):409-427.
From ''She Would Say That, Wouldn't She?'' to ''Does She Take Sugar?'' Epistemic Injustice and Disability.Jackie Leach Scully - 2018 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 11 (1):106-124.
Predictive model for progression of hearing loss: meta‐analysis of multi‐state outcome.Ting-Kuang Chao & Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (1):32-40.
Auditory autokinesis as a function of intramodal fields.James L. Fobes & David R. Perrott - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):13.
The Angelic Doctor and Angelic Speech: The Development of Thomas Aquinas’s Thought on How Angels Communicate.Harm Goris - 2003 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 11 (1):87-105.
Informed consent and deafness in South Africa: Guidelines for clinicians and researchers.C. Penn & V. de Andrade - 2017 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 10 (2):58-62.
The methodology of Maurice Hauriou: legal, sociological, philosophical.Christopher B. Gray - 2010 - New York, NY: Rodopi.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-10-17
Downloads
37 (#422,084)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
2018-10-17
Downloads
37 (#422,084)
6 months
9 (#295,075)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the second decade.Giovanni Sartor, Michał Araszkiewicz, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Tom van Engers, Enrico Francesconi, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sileno, Frank Schilder, Adam Wyner & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):521-557.
Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving.Thomas Linsbichler, Marco Maratea, Andreas Niskanen, Johannes P. Wallner & Stefan Woltran - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 307 (C):103697.
Explanation in AI and law: Past, present and future.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Danushka Bollegala - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence 289 (C):103387.
Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective.Markku Suksi - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 29 (1):87-110.
Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):221-238.
References found in this work
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial.Sanjay Modgil & Henry Prakken - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):31-62.
A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using Abstract Dialectical Frameworks.Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (1):1-49.
HYPO's legacy: introduction to the virtual special issue.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (2):205-250.
Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomes.Kevin D. Ashley & Stefanie Brüninghaus - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (2):125-165.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo