Correction to: A process ontology approach in biochemistry: the case of GPCRs and biosignaling

Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):189-206 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to process ontology in the philosophy of biology, the living world is better understood as processes rather than as substantial individuals. Within this perspective, an organism does not consist of a hierarchy of structures like a machine, but rather a dynamic hierarchy of processes, dynamically maintained and stabilized at different time scales. With this respect, two processual approaches on enzymes by Stein (Hyle Int J Philos Chem 10(4):5–22, 2004, Process Stud 34:62–80, 2005, Found Chem 8:3–29, 2006) and by Guttinger (Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018) allows to think of macromolecules as relational and processual entities. In this work, I propose to extend their arguments to another case study within the biochemical domain, which is the case of ligand receptors and receptor-mediated biosignaling. The aim of this work is to analyze the case of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and biosignaling under the consideration of a processual ontology. I will defend that the processual ontology framework is adequate for the biochemical domain and that it allows accounting for the current biochemical knowledge related to the case study.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interview with Olimpia Lombardi.Eric R. Scerri - 2022 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):101-117.
Author Index Volume 4.[author unknown] - 2002 - Foundations of Chemistry 4 (3):249-249.
Authors Index Volume 3.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 3 (3):273-273.
Authors Index Volume 2.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 2 (3):265-265.
Editorial 72.Eric Scerri - 2022 - Foundations of Chemistry 24 (3):311-313.
Author Index Volume 7.[author unknown] - 2005 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (3):325-325.
Author Index Volume 5.[author unknown] - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):263-263.
Author Index Volume 6.[author unknown] - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 6 (3):253-253.
The emergence of the philosophy of chemistry.Lee McIntyre - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):57-63.
Call for papers.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):97-97.
Instructions for authors.[author unknown] - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):99-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-21

Downloads
14 (#961,492)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiorela Alassia
Universidad Nacional de La Patagonia San Juan Bosco

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2020 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71 (3):799-825.
A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology.John A. Dupre & Daniel J. Nicholson - 2018 - In Daniel J. Nicholson & John Dupré (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Messy Chemical Kinds.Joyce C. Havstad - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3):719-743.
Process Philosophy.Johanna Seibt - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Process Metaphysics. An Introduction to Process Philosophy.Nicholas Rescher - 1996 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (4):689-697.

View all 20 references / Add more references