THE RHIZOMES OF AUTHENTIC PHILOSOPHY

FLSF (Felsefe Ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi) 1 (33):1-22 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article supports the thesis that the rejection of the analytic/Continental distinction is not possible with an analytic point of view, and grounds the possibility of authentic philosophy within the reasons for the existence of contemporary Continental philosophy. After the presentation of the problem, in the first part, the reasons why classical philosophy was experienced as a way of life in ancient Greece is explained and associated with the act of ‘parrhesia’. In the second part, the rise of the analytic/Continental distinction and the dogmas of reductionism and scientism are shed light on with reference to the texts of some pioneering analytic philosophers. Afterwards, the problem of hegemony in the Anglophone world is pointed out and the position of Continental philosophy is reconsidered under the conceptualization major and minor philosophy. Finally, contemporary Continental philosophy is defined as ‘authentic philosophy’ due to the rhizomatic connections it establishes both in itself & at an interdisciplinary level.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sporun felsefi̇ boyutlarinin değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇.Ersin Afacan & Nazmi Avci - 2019 - Tabula Rasa: Felsefe Ve Teoloji 31:85-95.
Fenomena Mental dalam Filsafat Analitik Awal.Ajeng Putriningrum - 2016 - Cogito: Jurnal Mahasiswa Filsafat 3 (2):107-120.
On the Possibility of Supertasks.Ahmet Çevik - 2013 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):171-180.
Rusya Federasyonu'nun Kırım Hamlesine Analitik Bakış.Mehmet Sait Di̇lek - 2015 - Journal of Turkish Studies 10 (Volume 10 Issue 14):245-245.
Bos̩ adlar ve dil felsefesinin ontolojik yükü.Yavuz Recep Bas̩oğlu & Mehmet Taylan Cüyaz - 2017 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 10 (1).
Rus ve Türk Dilindeki Bağlaçlara Analitik Bir Yaklaşım.Hüseyin Parlak - 2016 - Journal of Turkish Studies 11 (Volume 11 Issue 10):473-473.
Eleşti̇rel teori̇ ve di̇l.Muhammed Karamolla - 2021 - Tabula Rasa: Felsefe Ve Teoloji 34:64-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-28

Downloads
170 (#109,677)

6 months
66 (#64,054)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

İbrahim Okan Akkın
Ardahan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The nature of judgment.G. E. Moore - 1899 - Mind 8 (2):176-193.
The Nature of Judgment.G. E. Moore - 1899 - Philosophical Review 8:528.
The Future of Philosophy.Moritz Schlick - 1932 - College of the Pacific Publications in Philosophy 1:45--62.
What is continental philosophy?Simon Critchley - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.

Add more references