Defining futile life-prolonging treatments through Neo-Socratic Dialogue

BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):51 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Japan, people are negative towards life-prolonging treatments. Laws that regulate withholding or discontinuing life-prolonging treatments and advance directives do not exist. Physicians, however, view discontinuing life-prolonging treatments negatively due to fears of police investigations. Although ministerial guidelines were announced regarding the decision process for end-of-life care in 2007, a consensus could not be reached on the definition of end-of-life and conditions for withholding treatment. We established a forum for extended discussions and consensus building on this topic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just Dying: The Futility of Futility.Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):583-584.
"Playing God" and the Removal of Life-Prolonging Therapy.J. J. Paris & M. Poorman - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):403-418.
Withholding Life Prolonging Treatment, and Self Deception.G. M. Sayers - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6):347-352.
Life-Prolonging Killings and Their Relevance to Ethics.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (2):135-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-10

Downloads
37 (#313,008)

6 months
2 (#277,475)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?