What Chains Does Liouville’s Theorem Put on Maxwell’s Demon?

Philosophy of Science 78 (1):149-164 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently Albert and Hemmo and Shenker have argued that, contrary to what is sometimes suggested, Liouville's theorem does not prohibit a Maxwellian demon from operating but merely places certain restrictions on its ability to operate. There are two main claims made in this article. First, that the restrictions Liouville's theorem places on Maxwell's demon's ability to operate depend on which notion of entropy one adopts. Second, that when one operates with the definition of entropy that is usual in this debate, the restrictions put on Maxwell's demon are not even as severe as Albert and Hemmo and Shenker argue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Information-Theoretic Statistical Mechanics without Landauer’s Principle.Daniel Parker - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):831-856.
Demons in Physics. [REVIEW]Amit Hagar - 2014 - Metascience 23 (2):1-10.
Maxwell's demon and computation.Richard Laing - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (2):171-178.
Objectivity, information, and Maxwell's demon.Steven Weinstein - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1245-1255.
The Thought Experiment of Maxwell’s Demon and the Origin of Irreversibility.Aspasia S. Moue - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (1):69 - 84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
44 (#352,984)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thermodynamic asymmetry in time.Craig Callender - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Exorcist XIV: The Wrath of Maxwell’s Demon. Part I. From Maxwell to Szilard.John Earman & John D. Norton - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (4):435-471.
Boltzmann and Gibbs: An attempted reconciliation.D. A. Lavis - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):245-273.
Eaters of the lotus: Landauer's principle and the return of Maxwell's demon.John D. Norton - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (2):375-411.

View all 6 references / Add more references