Poe's law, group polarization, and the epistemology of online religious discourse

Social Semiotics 22 (4) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Poe's Law is roughly that online parodies of religious extremism are indistinguishable from instances of sincere extremism. Poe's Law may be expressed in a variety of ways, each highlighting either a facet of indirect discourse generally, attitudes of online audiences, or the quality of online religious material. As a consequence of the polarization of online discussions, invocations of Poe's Law have relevance in wider circles than religion. Further, regular invocations of Poe's Law in critical discussions have the threat of further entrenching and polarizing views.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

1,827 (#3,623)

6 months
50 (#41,176)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

After virtue: a study in moral theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1984 - Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
After Virtue.A. MacIntyre - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46 (1):169-171.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.

View all 21 references / Add more references