Academic Doping: Institutional Policies Regarding Nonmedical use of Prescription Stimulants in U.S. Higher Education

Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (3):229-243 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Academic integrity policies at 200 institutions of higher education were examined for the presence of academic prohibitions against the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants or any other cognitive enhancing drug. Researchers used online search tools to locate policy handbooks in a stratified random sample of IHE’s drawn from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System database, searching for NMUPS/CED use as violations of either academic integrity or alcohol and other drug policies. Of 191 academic integrity policies found online, NMUPS/CED prohibitions were present in only one. However, NMUPS was addressed in all but two of the 200 IHE AOD policies, often with language referencing IHE adherence to federal or state law. NMUPS/CED prohibitions are predominantly absent in IHE academic integrity policies, raising questions about whether colleges and universities are concerned about the use of enhancement drugs as a form of cheating. Implications for fairness, health promotion, and future research are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embedding Academic Integrity in Public Universities.Loreta Tauginienė - 2016 - Journal of Academic Ethics 14 (4):327-344.
Academic Freedom and Religiously Affiliated Universities.Liviu Andreescu - 2008 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 7 (19):162-183.
Cognitive Enhancements and the Values of Higher Education.Matt Lamkin - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (4):347-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-13

Downloads
33 (#473,861)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?