From Game Theoretical Accounts of Cooperation to Meta-Ethical Choices

Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):176-183 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolutionary game theory is ethically neutral: its assumption of ‘rationality’ has nothing to do with selfishness but is in fact entirely compatible with altruism. If altruism has an evolutionary explanation then this fact is of no theological relevance: in particular it is not any sort of evidence of a divine plan etc.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Relevance of Decision Theory to Ethical Theory.Jan Narveson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):497-520.
Beyond rationality: Rigor without mortis in game theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):180-192.
Facts About Natural Values.Robert Elliot - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (3):221 - 234.
Why not go all the way.Richard Schuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.
Independent choices and the interpretation of IF logic.Theo M. V. Janssen - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):367-387.
A meta-ethical critique of care ethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):505-517.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
189 (#101,511)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arif Ahmed
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reciprocity and the social contract.Ken Binmore - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):5-35.

Add more references