Interpretation:1-62 (forthcoming)
Abstract |
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale formation is a clay- and organic-rich emerging shale play with a considerable amount of hydrocarbon resources. Despite the substantial potential, there have been only a few wells drilled and produced in the formation over the recent years. The analyzed TMS samples contain an average of 50 wt% total clay, 27 wt% quartz and 14 wt% calcite and the mineralogy varies considerably over the small intervals. The high amount of clay leads to pronounced anisotropy and the frequent changes in mineralogy result in the heterogeneity of the formation. We studied the compressional and shear-wave velocities to evaluate the degree of anisotropy and heterogeneity, which impact hydraulic fracture growth, borehole instabilities, and subsurface imaging. The ultrasonic measurements of P- and S-wave velocities from five TMS wells are the best fit to the linear relationship with R2 = 0.84 in the least-squares criteria. We observed that TMS S-wave velocities are relatively lower when compared to the established velocity relationships. Most of the velocity data in bedding-normal direction lie outside constant VP/VS lines of 1.6–1.8, a region typical of most organic-rich shale plays. For all of the studied TMS samples, the S-wave velocity anisotropy exhibits higher values than P-wave velocity anisotropy. In the samples in which the composition is dominated by either calcite or quartz minerals, mineralogy controls the velocities and VP/VS ratios to a great extent. Additionally, the organic content and maturity account for the velocity behavior in the samples in which the mineralogical composition fails to do so. The results provide further insights into TMS Formation evaluation and contribute to a better understanding of the heterogeneity and anisotropy of the play.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1190/int-2019-0268.1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Characterization of Elastic Mechanical Properties of Tuscaloosa Marine Shale From Well Logs Using the Vertical Transversely Isotropic Model.Cristina Mariana Ruse & Mehdi Mokhtari - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):T1023-T1036.
Similar books and articles
Geologic and Geochemical Characteristics of the Cambrian Marine Shale in the Tarim Basin of China and Their Implication for the Prediction of Shale-Gas Resources.Jinqi Qiao, Luofu Liu, Baojian Shen & Xiaoqing Shang - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (3):T657-T669.
Effect of Anisotropy, Angle, and Critical Tensile Stress and Confining Pressures on Evaluation of Shale Brittleness Index — Part 1: Methodology and Laboratory Study.Qing Wang, Bo Zhang, Shiguang Guo & Jianguang Han - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (3):T637-T646.
Characterization of a Shale-Gas Reservoir Based on a Seismic AVO Inversion for VTI Media and Quantitative Seismic Interpretation.Feng Zhang, Lin Wang & Xiang-Yang Li - forthcoming - Interpretation:1-40.
Evolution and Migration of Shale Facies and Their Control on Shale Gas: A Case Study From the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations in the Sichuan Basin and its Surroundings.Zongquan Hu, Wei Du, Chuanxiang Sun, Jing Wu, Tong Zhu, Jianhua Zhao & Caina Yan - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (4):SN57-SN70.
Pore Structure Characteristics and its Effect on Adsorption Capacity of Niutitang Marine Shale in Sangzhi Block, Southern China.Xinghua Wang, Arash Dahi Taleghani & Wenlong Ding - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (4):T843-T856.
Near-Salt Stress-Induced Seismic Velocity Changes and Seismic Anisotropy and Their Impacts on Salt Imaging: A Case Study in the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, China.Yunqiang Sun, Gang Luo, Yaxing Li, Mingwen Wang, Xiaofeng Jia, Cheng Chang & Rui Zhang - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):T487-T499.
Characterization of a Shale-Gas Reservoir Based on a Seismic Amplitude Variation with Offset Inversion for Transverse Isotropy with Vertical Axis of Symmetry Media and Quantitative Seismic Interpretation.Feng Zhang, Lin Wang & Xiang-Yang Li - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (1):SA11-SA23.
Influencing Factor Analysis of the Elastic Properties of Shale with Rock-Physical Model Including Pressure Effects.Zhaoyun Zong, Man Jiang & Miaomiao Xu - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (3):T515-T524.
Azimuthal Anisotropy Analysis Applied to Naturally Fractured Unconventional Reservoirs: A Barnett Shale Example.Jing Zhang, Jie Qi, Yijin Zeng, Kurt Marfurt & Roger Slatt - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):SP13-SP29.
Quantitative Prediction of Total Organic Carbon Content in Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using Seismic Data: A Case Study From the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Chang Ning Gas Field of the Sichuan Basin, China.Sheng Chen, Wenzhi Zhao, Qingcai Zeng, Qing Yang, Pei He, Shaohua Gai & Yu Deng - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (4):SN153-SN168.
Fracability Evaluation of Lacustrine Shale by Integrating Brittleness and Fracture Toughness.Cheng Huang, Chao Yang & Feng Shen - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (2):T363-T372.
A Gas-Content Calculation Model for Terrestrial Shales in the Kuqa Depression, the Tarim Basin, Western China.Yiqian Qu, Wei Sun, Song Guo, Shuai Shao & Xiuxiang Lv - 2019 - Interpretation 7 (2):T513-T524.
Pore Structure and Controlling Factors of Dolomite-Bearing High-Salinity Shale Reservoir in Qianjiang Formation, Jianghan Basin, China.Tong Zhou, Jianzheng Su, Shichao Fan, Zhaofeng Li, Xiaoxue Liu & Xianglu Tang - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (4):T675-T686.
Sulfur Isotope of Pyrite Response to Redox Chemistry in Organic Matter-Enriched Shales and Implications for Components of Shale Gas.Dongya Zhu, Quanyou Liu, Bing Zhou, Zhijun Jin & Tianyi Li - 2018 - Interpretation: SEG 6 (4):SN71-SN83.
Using Well-Log Data to Modeling Factors Influencing the Amount of Adsorbed Gas in Transitional Shale Reservoirs.Rui Liu, Shaobin Guo & Kun Ji - 2020 - Interpretation 8 (2):T249-T258.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-14
Total views
6 ( #1,128,750 of 2,498,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,184 )
2020-06-14
Total views
6 ( #1,128,750 of 2,498,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #427,476 of 2,498,184 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads