Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (2):151-170 (2012)
AbstractThe present study aimed at investigating the status of cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. One hundred thirty two university students were surveyed to this end. They were selected through convenient sampling. The results indicated that cheating is quite common among the Iranian language students. The most important reasons for this behavior were found to be “not being ready for the exam”, “difficulty of the exam”, “lack of time to study” and “careless and lenient instructors”. The study also indicated that the most common methods of cheating are “talking to the adjacent individuals”, “copying from others' test papers”, and “using gestures to get the answers from others”. It was also found that the student’s field of study, academic level, and occupational status had a significant effect on cheating whereas gender and marital status had no effect in this regard. Furthermore, it became clear that field of study and occupational status had a significant effect on students’ attitude toward cheating whereas gender, academic level and marital status had no effect. Finally, the study indicated that age significantly correlated with cheating and attitude toward cheating
Similar books and articles
The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates.Trevor S. Harding, Matthew J. Mayhew, Cynthia J. Finelli & Donald D. Carpenter - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):255 – 279.
Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Cheating?Kathleen K. Molnar & Marilyn G. Kletke - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):201-212.
Using the Scenario Method to Analyze Cheating Behaviors.Peter W. Schuhmann, Robert T. Burrus, Preston D. Barber, J. Edward Graham & M. Fara Elikai - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):17-33.
A Cross-Country Evaluation of Cheating in Academia—A Comparison of Data From the US and the Czech Republic.Marek Preiss, Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg & Alena Nohavova - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):157-167.
Student Perceptions of Faculty Use of Cheating Deterrents.Robert Liebler - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):327-333.
Students' Ethical Behavior in Iran.Mehran Nejati, Reza Jamali & Mostafa Nejati - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (4):277-285.
Methods of Cheating and Deterrents to Classroom Cheating: An International Study.Richard A. Bernardi, Ania V. Baca, Kristen S. Landers & Michael B. Witek - 2008 - Ethics and Behavior 18 (4):373 – 391.
True Confessions?: Alumni's Retrospective Reports on Undergraduate Cheating Behaviors.Jennifer Yardley & Melanie Domenech Rodr - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):1 – 14.
Articles: The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: A Natural Experiment.David A. Rettinger & Augustus E. Jordan - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):107 – 129.
The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students' Perceptions of Cheating.Rafik Z. Elias - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):199 - 209.
Cheating in Advantaged High Schools: Prevalence, Justifications, and Possibilities for Change.Mollie K. Galloway - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (5):378 - 399.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Academic Dishonesty at Universities: The Case of Plagiarism Among Iranian Language Students. [REVIEW]Atefeh Rezanejad & Saeed Rezaei - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):275-295.
Plagiarism in the Academic Context: A Study of Iranian EFL Learners.Alireza Ahmadi - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (3):151-168.
Plagiarism Among Iranian Graduate Students of Language Studies: Perspectives and Causes.Esmat Babaii & Hassan Nejadghanbar - 2017 - Ethics and Behavior 27 (3):240-258.
Self-Reported Examination Cheating of Alumni and Enrolled Students: Evidence From Ghana.Christopher Mensah, Edem M. Azila-Gbettor & Vincent Asimah - 2018 - Journal of Academic Ethics 16 (1):89-102.
Friends With Benefits: Causes and Effects of Cheating During Examinations.Leo Andrew Diego - 2017 - International Academic Forum 5 (2):121-138.
References found in this work
Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.Kenneth D. Butterfield, Linda Klebe Trevino & Donald L. McCabe - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):219-232.
A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality.Carol S. Dweck & Ellen L. Leggett - 1988 - Psychological Review 95 (2):256-273.
Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Yusuf J. Ugras - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1117-1127.
Concerns of College Students Regarding Business Ethics.Richard F. Beltramini, Robert A. Peterson & George Kozmetsky - 1984 - Journal of Business Ethics 3 (3):195 - 200.
College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy.Augustus E. Jordan - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):233-247.