Posmodern feminism D. J. Haraway and S. Harding. [Spanish]

Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 8:222-232 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Normal 0 21 false false false ES X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} In this text is characterized the “Postmodern. Feminism” and the theoretical positions of two influential contemporary thinkers in Philosophy of Science from a postmodern feminist perspective. Haraway and Harding debate around the History of Science and its andocentric slants, as well as on the concept “identity” from the c yborg paradigm. Within the postmodern paradigm they assume the poststructuralist and deconstructionist inheritance and defend the necessity of a critical and autorreflexive social science like model of all sciences, but they have controversies about the gendered social space. Haraway understands that the social space is not homogenous, and that the three dimensions that Harding detects: generic symbolism, partner-sexual division of the work and processes of gendered individual identity, they are intercepted in multiple dimensions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Irigaray and the question on sexual difference. [Spanish].Amalia Boyer - 2004 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 2:90-103.
Reality and interest. The horizon of Kantian ethics. [Spanish].Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2005 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 3:8-35.
The natural law in the Hobbesian contractual theory. [Spanish].Laura Quintana - 2004 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 2:64-87.
The concept of phenomenon in the early Heidegger. [Spanish].Francisco de Lara - 2008 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 8:234-256.
Ludwik Fleck: forerunner of Thomas Kuhn's thinking. [Spanish].Mónica Pérez Marín - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 13:130-149.
The man without quality. [Spanish].Etienne Tassin - 2004 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 2:124-149.
A Hertzian Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Sara Bizarro - 2011 - Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 13:150-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
35 (#335,810)

6 months
5 (#153,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ciencia Y Feminismo.S. Harding - 1999 - Revista Agustiniana 40.

Add more references