Polysemy and word meaning: an account of lexical meaning for different kinds of content words

Philosophical Studies 175 (4):947-968 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the meaning of lexical words, i.e., words that contribute with content to the meaning of sentences. This debate has coincided with a renewal in the study of polysemy, which has taken place in the psycholinguistics camp mainly. There is already a fruitful interbreeding between two lines of research: the theoretical study of lexical word meaning, on the one hand, and the models of polysemy psycholinguists present, on the other. In this paper I aim at deepening on this ongoing interbreeding, examine what is said about polysemy, particularly in the psycholinguistics literature, and then show how what we seem to know about the representation and storage of polysemous senses affects the models that we have about lexical word meaning.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-22

Downloads
6,295 (#1,101)

6 months
463 (#3,893)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

Slur Reclamation and the polysemy/homonymy distinction.Tomasz Zyglewicz - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions.Robyn Carston - 2021 - Mind and Language 36 (1):108-133.
How to Think about Zeugmatic Oddness.Michelle Liu - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (4):1109-1132.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
New horizons in the study of language and mind.Noam Chomsky - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 38 references / Add more references