Commentary: Should the Belmont Report Be Extended to Animal Research

&
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):58-66 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0963180119000781

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rethinking the Belmont Report?Phoebe Friesen, Lisa Kearns, Barbara Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15-21.
A Belmont Report for Animals?Hope Ferdowsian, L. Syd M. Johnson, Jane Johnson, Andrew Fenton, Adam Shriver & John Gluck - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):19-37.
On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics.Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (12):790-791.
Overseeing Innovative Therapy without Mistaking It for Research: A Function-Based Model Based on Old Truths, New Capacities, and Lessons from Stem Cells.Patrick L. Taylor - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):286-302.
Commentary: A Belmont Report for Animals? Rights or Welfare?Lori Marino - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):67-70.
Commentary: A Belmont Report for Animals: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.Alka Chandna - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):46-53.
Autonomy and informed consent: A mistaken association? [REVIEW]Sigurdur Kristinsson - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):253-264.
The historical foundations of the research-practice distinction in bioethics.Tom L. Beauchamp & Yashar Saghai - 2012 - Heoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):45-56.
Responsible research: What is expected? Commentary on: “Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials”.Stephanie J. Bird - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):693-696.
The case against animal research.Tom Regan - forthcoming - Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Human and animal research guidelines: Aligning ethical constructs with new scientific developments.Hope Ferdowsian - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):472-478.
The Belmont Report.Tom L. Beauchamp - 2008 - In Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 149--55.
Does the moral philosophy of the Belmont Report rest on a mistake?Ernest Marshall - 1986 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (6):5.
Vulnerable populations in research: The case of the seriously ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
Revisiting the Belmont Report.Wesley J. Smith - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (2):5.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-21

Downloads
8 (#1,287,956)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernardo Aguilera Dreyse
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
A Belmont Report for Animals?Hope Ferdowsian, L. Syd M. Johnson, Jane Johnson, Andrew Fenton, Adam Shriver & John Gluck - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):19-37.

Add more references