Many thanks to bioethics reviewers

, , , , , , , , &
In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Bioethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 2002 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/bioe.2011.25.issue-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Peer reviewers can meet journals’ criteria for authorship.Thomas Erren, Michael Erren & David Shaw - 2013 - British Medical Journal 346:f166.
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian H. Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers.Adrian Aldcroft - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):14.
Response to “From Pittsburgh to Cleveland: NHBD Controversies and Bioethics” by George J. Agich.Frank Koughan & Walt Bogdanich - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):514-517.
We would like to thank the following for contributing to the journal as reviewers this past year: Rebecca Abraham Fred Adams.Ken Aizawa, Anna Alexandrova, Sophie Allen, Michael Anderson, Holly Anderson, Kristin Andrews, Andre Ariew, Edward Averill & Andrew R. Bailey - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (6):859-860.
The Salience of Narrative for Bioethics.George J. Agich - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):50-50.
What We Owe the Author: rethinking editorial peer review.N. J. Crigger - 1998 - Nursing Ethics 5 (5):451-457.
Reply to Reviewers.Jonathan Bennett - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):647-662.
Reply to reviewers.Review author[S.]: Jonathan Bennett - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (3):647-662.
Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey.Marion Broome, Molly C. Dougherty, Margaret C. Freda, Margaret H. Kearney & Judith G. Baggs - 2010 - Nursing Ethics 17 (6):741-748.
Evidence for the effectiveness of Peer review.Robert H. Fletcher & Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.
Has Penrose Disproved A.I.?Robin Hanson - unknown
Response to “From Pittsburgh to Cleveland: NHBD Controversies and Bioethics” by George J. Agich (CQ Vol 8, No 3)Say It Ain't So: 60 Minutes on NHBD. [REVIEW]George J. Agich - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):517-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gideon Calder
University of South Wales
Emma Cave
Durham University
Rebecca Bennett
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references