Teleogy and genes

Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):289-300 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to quickly sketch a teleological approach to the problem of isolating the impact of genes on phenotypic characters. I begin by arguing that it is a mistake to think that there will be only one analysis of genetic input suitable for all theoretical interests. My principle focus is Richard Dawkins' argument for genic selectionism. I argue that a teleological analysis of genetic input is what Dawkins requires to establish the right kind of mapping of gene onto phenotype. This comes at a certain cost, however. Accepting the analysis will threaten Dawkins' claims about the teleogogical priority of gene over phenotype.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#380,229)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Agar
Victoria University of Wellington

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

In defense of proper functions.Ruth Millikan - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (June):288-302.
The Return of the Gene.Kim Sterelny & Philip Kitcher - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):339.
The return of the Gene.Kim Sterelny & Philip Kitcher - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy 85 (7):339-361.

View all 9 references / Add more references