How Technology Aids and Impedes the Growth of Science

PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:585 - 597 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The vision of Horace, combining the sweet and the useful, is an expression of a sense of abundance. It came first and was than supported by Bacon's vision of a science-based technology. Later this was further backed by classical liberalism and by metaphysical progressivism. That technology may impede and even destroy science is obvious. Yet the danger is overlooked--with the aid of the vision of Horace and of neo-conservative (Popperian) politics and of neo-reactionary (Kuhnian) politics of science. The science of science policy needs boosting in order to study means of democratic control of technology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and culture.Raphael Sassower - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):499-508.
Technology: Autonomous or neutral.Hans Oberdiek - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):67 – 77.
Why not Post-Political?Michel Puech - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (2):351-353.
Philosophy of technology: an introduction.Val Dusek (ed.) - 1993 - Oxford: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
18 (#808,169)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Agassi
York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references