Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments

Argumentation 21 (1):83-92 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Analogies must be symmetric. If a is like b, then b is like a. So if a has property R, and if R is within the scope of the analogy, then b (probably) has R. However, analogical arguments generally single out, or depend upon, only one of a or b to serve as the basis for the inference. In this respect, analogical arguments are directed by an asymmetry. I defend the importance of this neglected – even when explicitly mentioned – feature in understanding analogical arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analogy and confirmation theory.Mary Hesse - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (4):319-327.
Verdi is the puccini of music.John Woods & Brent Hudak - 1992 - Synthese 92 (2):189 - 220.
Taking Analogical Inference Seriously: Darwin's Argument from Artificial Selection.C. Kenneth Waters - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:502 - 513.
Analogy counterarguments and the acceptability of analogical hypotheses.Cameron Shelley - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):477-496.
Plantinga and other minds.Karl Ameriks - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):285-91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
30 (#459,346)

6 months
4 (#319,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?