Gene-culture coevolution does not replace standard evolutionary theory

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):146-146 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Though the target article is not without fertile suggestions, at least two problems limit its overall validity: (1) the extended gene-culture coevolutionary framework is not an alternative to standard evolutionary theory; (2) the proposed model does not explain how much time is necessary for selective pressure to determine the stabilization of a new aspect of the genotype.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,099

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):1-16.
Music, bonding, and human evolution: A critique.Bjorn Merker - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44:e83.
The Evolutionary Gene and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis.Qiaoying Lu & Pierrick Bourrat - 2017 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3):775-800.
Sexual selection and social roles: Two models or one?Pierre L. van den Berghe - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):291-292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
72 (#327,526)

6 months
11 (#406,166)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references