Water and Ice

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):629 - 634 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(I) In Beyond Rigidity, Scott Soames argues that the term ‘water’ is ambiguous. On one disambiguation, it is an expansive predicate that is true of any quantity of H2O whatsoever. On a second disambiguation, it is a restricted predicate, true only of liquid quantities of H2O. Analytic philosophers are fond of claiming ambiguities where there are none. This, I shall argue, is the case with the claimed expansive‐restricted ambiguity. The predicate‐kind ambiguity I have no quibble with.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
71 (#222,417)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Sennet
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations