Die Dritte Moeglichkeit: The Neo-Kantian 'Raum' Controversy, From Trendelenburg to Vaihinger

Dissertation, University of South Florida (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the "Transcendental Aesthetic" section of the Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kant dismisses both the Newtonian and the Leibnizian notions of space. In their place he offers his own view that space is a "pure intuition" which is both empirically real and transcendentally ideal. Kant means by this that space is objectively valid and is applicable to things as they appear to us, but that it is not something that either exists independently of humans or as a relation that pertains between things as they really are. In his claim that space is valid only for appearances, Kant rules out the possibility that space is both subjective and objective . Whether Kant is entitled to rule out this possibility has been a perennial topic for debate among Kantian scholars. Critics argue that on his own principles Kant has no justification for dismissing die Dritte Moglichkeit, the possibility that space applies both to appearances and to die Dingen an sich. The question of die Dritte Moglichkeit was taken up earnestly in the middle of the nineteenth century when F. A. Trendelenburg charged that Kant had not considered this possibility. Kuno Fischer attempted to defend Kant, and with that a controversy began that would last almost fifty years and that would draw into it many prominent Neo-Kantian scholars. Some participating in the controversy believed that Trendelenburg overstated the case and argued that Kant, in fact, had considered die Dritte Moglichkeit. The question was not whether he considered it but whether he was entitled to dismiss it. Arnoldt, Cohen, Grapengiesser and others claimed that he was entitled to do so, while Tiebe and Vaihinger, among others, charged that he was not. ;I trace this controversy over the Kantian conception of space from its beginning between Trendelenburg and Fischer to its effective conclusion. I then sketch a possible defense for Kant. I hope to have shed some light on Kant's controversial conception of space by examining it in reference to an important controversy among members of the German academic community

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

F. A. Trendelenburg and the Neglected Alternative.Andrew Specht - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):514-534.
Recent Work on the Philosophy of Kant.M. J. Scott-Taggart - 1966 - American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (3):171 - 209.
Kant On The Ideality Of Space.Kenneth Rogerson - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (June):271-286.
Kant and non-euclidean geometry.Amit Hagar - 2008 - Kant Studien 99 (1):80-98.
Kant - On Kästner's Treatises.Dennis Schulting & Christian Onof - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (2):305–313.
Kant's Model of the Mind.Wayne Allan Waxman - 1987 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Inspirations from Kant: essays.Leslie Forster Stevenson - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
1 (#1,884,204)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references