Lax monitoring versus logical intuition: The determinants of confidence in conjunction fallacy

Thinking and Reasoning 22 (1):99-117 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe general assumption that people fail to notice discrepancy between their answer and the normative answer in the conjunction fallacy task has been challenged by the theory of Logical Intuition. This theory suggests that people can detect the conflict between the heuristic and normative answers even if they do not always manage to inhibit their intuitive choice. This theory gained support from the finding that people report lower levels of confidence in their choice after they commit the conjunction fallacy compared to when their answer is not in conflict with logic. In four experiments we asked the participants to give probability estimations to the options of the conflict and no-conflict versions of the tasks in the original set-up of the experiment or in a three-option design. We found that participants perceive probabilities for the options of the conflict version less similar than for the no-conflict version. As people are less confident when choosing between more similar options, this simil..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How fallacious is the consequence fallacy?Wai-Hung Wong & Zanja Yudell - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (1):221-227.
On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: Confirmation versus probability.K. Tentori, V. Crupi & S. Russo - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142 (1):235-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-15

Downloads
36 (#326,121)

6 months
1 (#447,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?