Are There Enough Injective Sets?

Studia Logica 101 (3):467-482 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The axiom of choice ensures precisely that, in ZFC, every set is projective: that is, a projective object in the category of sets. In constructive ZF (CZF) the existence of enough projective sets has been discussed as an additional axiom taken from the interpretation of CZF in Martin-Löf’s intuitionistic type theory. On the other hand, every non-empty set is injective in classical ZF, which argument fails to work in CZF. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the problem whether there are (enough) injective sets in CZF. We show that no two element set is injective unless the law of excluded middle is admitted for negated formulas, and that the axiom of power set is required for proving that “there are strongly enough injective sets”. The latter notion is abstracted from the singleton embedding into the power set, which ensures enough injectives both in every topos and in IZF. We further show that it is consistent with CZF to assume that the only injective sets are the singletons. In particular, assuming the consistency of CZF one cannot prove in CZF that there are enough injective sets. As a complement we revisit the duality between injective and projective sets from the point of view of intuitionistic type theory



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

83 (#207,689)

6 months
15 (#185,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Schuster
University of Leeds

Citations of this work

The axiom of choice.John L. Bell - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Constructibility.Keith J. Devlin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):864-867.
On constructing completions.Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara & Peter Schuster - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):969-978.

Add more references