Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 4:32-47 (1970)
AbstractIt is easy to understand why Hegel's philosophy should be little studied by English-speaking philosophers today. Those who at the beginning of the twentieth century initiated the movement we are now caught up in presented their earliest philosophical arguments as criticisms of the prevailing Anglo-Hegelian views. It may now be thought illiberal to take much interest in this perhaps excusably slaughtered royal family, and positively reactionary to hanker after the foreign dynasty from which it sometimes claimed descent. Hegel was a systematic philosopher with a scope hardly to be found today, and men who, as we say, wish to keep up with their subject may well be daunted at the idea of having to understand a way of looking at philosophy which they suspect would not repay them for their trouble anyway. Furthermore, since Hegel wrote, formal logic has advanced in ways he could not have foreseen, and has, it seems to many, destroyed the whole basis of his dialectical method. At the same time, the creation of a science of sociology, it is supposed, has rendered obsolete the philosophy of history for which Hegel was at one time admired. In countries where there are Marxist intellectuals, Hegel does get discussed as the inadvertent forerunner of historical and dialectical materialism. But in England, where there is no such need or presence, there do not seem to be any very strong ideological reasons for discussing him. In what follows I shall be asking you to direct your thoughts to certain forgotten far-off things which I hope you will find historically interesting even if you do not agree with me that they give important clues for an understanding of human nature and human society.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hegel's Conception of the Study of Human Nature.H. B. Acton - 1970 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 4:32-47.
Hegel's Philosophy of Nature: Being Part Two of the Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Translated From Nicolin and Pöggeler's Edition (1959), and From the Zusätze in Michelet's Text (1847). [REVIEW]Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - 1970 - Oxford University Press.
The Importance and Relevance of Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature.Sebastian Rand - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 61 (2):379 - 400.
Human Nature and Historical Knowledge: Hume, Hegel and Vico.Leon Pompa - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic.John McTaggart Ellis McTaggart - 1896 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
The Dialectical Method: A Treatise Hegel Never Wrote.Clark Butler - 2011 - Humanity Books.
Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 1972 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Negativity and Dialectical Materialism: Zhang Shiying's Reading of Hegel's Dialectical Logic.Peter Button - 2007 - Philosophy East and West 57 (1):63-82.
Marx’s Inferential Commitment to Hegel’s Idealism in the Grundrisse.Matthew J. Smetona - 2012 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):351-372.
Recent Work on HegelAn Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel.Hegel's Development: Night Thoughts .Hegel.Hegel's Concept of God.History and System: Hegel's Philosophy of History.Hegel: An Introduction.Hegel and the Human Spirit: A Translation of the Fena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit with Commentary.Hegel's Dialectic and its Criticism. [REVIEW]Dudley R. Knowles, Errol E. Harris, H. S. Harris, M. J. Inwood, Quentin Lauer, Robert L. Perkins, Raymond Plant, Leo Rauch & Michael Rosen - 1985 - Philosophical Quarterly 35 (139):199.