Reflections on the reproductive sciences in agriculture in the UK and US, ca. 1900–2000+

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):316-339 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides a brief comparative overview of the development of the reproductive sciences especially in agriculture in the UK and the US. It begins with the establishment by F. H. A. Marshall in 1910 of the boundaries that framed the reproductive sciences as distinct from genetics and embryology. It then examines how and where the reproductive sciences were taken up in agricultural research settings, focusing on the differential development of US and UK institutions. The reproductive sciences were also pursued in medical and biological settings, and I discuss how the intersections among all three allowed the circulation of both ideas and scientists’ careers. Across the twentieth century, scientific leadership in the reproductive sciences alternated between the UK and US, and these patterns are elucidated. I conclude with thoughts on future research that might emphasize the elaboration of industrialization processes in agriculture and new capacities to transform both reproductive processes and their products—life itself—as biopower comes to be more ambitiously understood as extending across all species

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

'Crook' pipettes: embryonic emigrations from agriculture to reproductive biomedicine.Sarah Franklin - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):358-373.
Between the farm and the clinic: agriculture and reproductive technology in the twentieth century.Sarah Wilmot - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):303-315.
Albert the Great: a selectively annotated bibliography (1900-2000).Irven Michael Resnick - 2004 - Tempe, Ariz.: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Edited by Kenneth F. Kitchell.
Philosophy of Agricultural Science: A Japanese Perspective.Osamu Soda - 2006 - Distributor, International Specialized Book Services.
Is agriculture in need of ethics?Hayo Apotheker - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (1):9-16.
Rationality and ethics in agriculture.Hugh Lehman - 1995 - Moscow, Idaho: University of Idaho Press.
Biotechnology is compatible with sustainable agriculture.Donald Duvick - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):112-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
61 (#257,990)

6 months
18 (#135,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The demand for pregnancy testing: The Aschheim–Zondek reaction, diagnostic versatility, and laboratory services in 1930s Britain.Jesse Olszynko-Gryn - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47:233-247.
Between the farm and the clinic: agriculture and reproductive technology in the twentieth century.Sarah Wilmot - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):303-315.
From 'public service' to artificial insemination: animal breeding science and reproductive research in early twentieth-century Britain.Sarah Wilmot - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (2):411-441.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations