Hypatia 22 (4):46-63 (2007)

Abstract
: Theoretically, feminists ought to be the best deliberative democrats. However, political commitments (which this author shares) to inclusiveness on issues of reproductive health and gay and lesbian rights, for example, create a boundary within feminism between those committed to the "feminist consensus" on these issues and women activists who share some feminist commitments, but not all. This article offers theoretically and empirically informed suggestions for how feminists can foster inclusive deliberation within feminist spaces
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/hyp.2007.22.4.46
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,307
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions: James S. Fishkin.James S. Fishkin - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):242-260.
Learning to Deliberate.Paul Nieuwenburg - 2004 - Political Theory 32 (4):449-467.
The Conditionals of Deliberation.K. DeRose - 2010 - Mind 119 (473):1-42.
Summary.Ross P. Cameron - 2017 - Analysis 77 (4):775-777.
On Sunstein's Infotopia.David Estlund - 2009 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56 (120):14-29.
On Sunstein's Infotopia.David Estlund - 2009 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56 (119):14-29.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
53 ( #214,267 of 2,507,710 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,820 of 2,507,710 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes