What to Do if You Want to Defend a Theory You Cannot Prove

Journal of Philosophy 107 (1):35-56 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Towards an empirically adequate theory of science.Janet A. Kourany - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):526-548.
Understanding sensations.Nicholas Maxwell - 1968 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):127-146.
Current Physics and 'the Physical'.Agustín Vicente - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):393-416.
Physical Theory: Method and Interpretation.Lawrence Sklar (ed.) - 2014 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Taking particle physics seriously: A critique of the algebraic approach to quantum field theory.David Wallace - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (2):116-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-30

Downloads
668 (#23,689)

6 months
130 (#24,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Achinstein
Johns Hopkins University

Citations of this work

Maxwell’s contrived analogy: An early version of the methodology of modeling.Giora Hon & Bernard R. Goldstein - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (4):236-257.
Communicative Rationality of the Maxwellian Revolution.Rinat M. Nugayev - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (4):447-478.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references