- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Soames. 2008. Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism
Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 26 (2):259-261 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2005 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Frank Jackson & Michael Smith.
Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Ambitious two-dimensionalism.Scott Soames - 2007 - In Matthew Davidson (ed.), On Sense and Direct Reference. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 690--718.
Marcus and the new theory of reference: A reply to Scott Soames.Quentin Smith - 1995 - Synthese 104 (2):217-244.
Two-dimensionalism: A neo-Fregean interpretation.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2006 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Josep Macià (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
More Fuss about formulation: Sider (and me) on three- and four-dimensionalism.Christopher Hughes - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (4):463–480.
Erratum to: Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism. [REVIEW]Robert Michels - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):575-575.
Review of Scott Soames, Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism. [REVIEW]Eros Corazza - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (12).
In defence of three-dimensionalism.Kit Fine - 2006 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62:1-16.
Four-dimensionalism.Michael C. Rea - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-59.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-09-07
Downloads
26 (#577,276)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
2015-09-07
Downloads
26 (#577,276)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo