Rationality and Imagination in Cultural History: A Reply to Wayne Booth

Critical Inquiry 2 (3):447-464 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In retrospect, I think I was right to compose Natural Supernaturalism by relying on taste, tact, and intuition rather than on a controlling method. A book of this kind, which deals with the history of human intellection, feeling, and imagination, employs special vocabularies, procedures, and modes of demonstration which, over many centuries of development, have shown their profitability when applied to matters of this sort. I agree with Booth that these procedures, when valid, are in a broad sense rational, and subject to analysis and some degree of definition. But the rules underlying such a discourse are complex, elusive, unsystematic, and subject to innovative modification; they manifest themselves in the intuitive expertise of the historian; and the specification of these rules should not precede, but follow practice. . . . After the fact, nevertheless, a book like Natural Supernaturalism is subject to close critical inquiry about its methods and rationale. I am grateful to Booth for opening up such an inquiry, and for doing so in a way that is not only disarming, but seems to me to be the most promising of useful results. That is, instead of adopting a prosecutorial stance, demanding: "Justify the rationality and probative force of what you have done; it looks dammed suspicious to me," he has adopted the friendly tactic of saying: "Your book, in my experience of it, has yielded discoveries that I want to call knowledge, by methods, however deviant from standard rubrics of valid reasoning, that it seems irrational to call non-rational. Let's set out to clarify what these methods are, and to see what grounds we can find for the claim that they provide warranted knowledge." M.H. Abrams' contributions to Critical Inquiry are "The Deconstructive Angel" and "Behaviorism and Deconstruction: A Comment on Morse Peckham's 'The Infinitude of Pluralism'"

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction.Wayne C. Booth - 1988 - University of California Press.
Reply to Richard Berrong.Wayne C. Booth - 1985 - Critical Inquiry 11 (4):697-701.
The knowing most worth doing: essays on pluralism, ethics, and religion.Wayne C. Booth - 2010 - Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Edited by Walter Jost.
Our best rhetorologist.Wayne C. Booth - 1995 - Philosophy and Literature 19 (1):116-126.
Pluralism in the Classroom.Wayne C. Booth - 1986 - Critical Inquiry 12 (3):468-479.
Ten Literal "Theses".Wayne C. Booth - 1978 - Critical Inquiry 5 (1):175-176.
Wayne Booth, 1921–2005.W. J. T. Mitchell - 2006 - Critical Inquiry 32 (2):375.
Kenneth Burke's Way of Knowing.Wayne C. Booth - 1974 - Critical Inquiry 1 (1):1-22.
Introducing professor mearsheimer to his own university.Wayne C. Booth - 1998 - Philosophy and Literature 22 (1):174-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
28 (#490,139)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references