Prejudice reduction, collective action, and then what?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):425-426 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite downsides, it must, on balance, be good to reduce prejudice. Despite upsides, collective action can also have destructive outcomes. Improving intergroup relations requires multiple levels of analysis involving a broader approach to prejudice reduction, awareness of potential conflict escalation, development of intergroup understanding, and promotion of a wider human rights perspective

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unintentional collective action.Sara Rachel Chant - 2007 - Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):245 – 256.
Prejudice is about politics: A collective action perspective.John Drury - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):430-431.
Social facts explained and presupposed.Boris Hennig - 2006 - In Nikos Psarros & Katinka Schulte-Ostermann (eds.), Facets of Sociality. Ontos Verlag. pp. 243-264.
Rationality in collective action.Margaret Gilbert - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):3-17.
Acting together.Christopher Kutz - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):1-31.
Why We Did It: An Anscombian Account of Collective Action.Axel Seemann - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5):637-655.
Global collective action.Todd Sandler - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
45 (#345,268)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?