The following books have been received, and many of them are still avail-able for review. Interested reviewers please contact the reviews editor: jim. [email protected] ucd. ie [Book Review]
C. Abell, K. Bantinaki, C. J. Adams, T. L. Akehurst, A. Badiou, G. P. Baker, P. M. S. Hacker, Z. Bauman & A. Beards
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (1):139-154 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Some thoughts about the requirements for reviewing books.David Weissman - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (5):715-716.
Evidence for the effectiveness of Peer review.Robert H. Fletcher & Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.
The scope of the cognitive sciences: Reply to 6 reviews of the MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences.Frank Keil - manuscript
The tragedy of the common reviewers: the peer review process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown
Ethics and the accounting publishing process: Author, reviewer, and editor issues. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1785-1803.
Verisimilitude: views and reviews.Chris Brink - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):181-201.
A proof system for contact relation algebras.Ivo Düntsch & Ewa Orłowska - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (3):241-262.
Promoting F.A.I.T.h. In Peer review: Five core attributes of effective Peer review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-26
Downloads
27 (#433,607)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2013-10-26
Downloads
27 (#433,607)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
