Reply to Currie’s and Gilmore’s comments on Abell’s Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis

British Journal of Aesthetics 62 (2):195-204 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The metaphysical question of what determines the contents of fictive utterances is closely related to the epistemological question of how audiences identify the.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marx, postmodernism, and self‐management: Reply to Abell.David L. Prychitko - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (2):301-310.
Beliefs and Fictional Narrators.Derek Matravers - 1995 - Analysis 55 (2):121 - 122.
Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis.Catharine Abell - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
of Photographs.Catharine Abell - 2010 - In Catharine Abell Katerina Bantinaki (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. pp. 81.
Patchwork Puzzles and the Nature of Fiction.Patrik Engisch - 2019 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 56 (1):28-47.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-06

Downloads
43 (#361,277)

6 months
16 (#148,627)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catharine Abell
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis.Catharine Abell - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references