Opportunities and Challenges in the Use of Public Deliberation to Inform Public Health Policies

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):24-25 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As an approach to public engagement, deliberation has the potential to pursue a range of goals identified by public participation theorists including the opportunity to substantively inform policy processes, increase the public’s knowledge and understanding of public issues and create or restore loss of public trust and confidence in public institutions. Baum and colleagues (2009) offer several important take-home messages for policy makers and public health leaders about the value of engaging with the public about ethically challenging, value-laden and resource intensive policy issues such as pandemic response planning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public Health and Public Goods.Jonny Anomaly - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
Worldwide deliberation and public use of reason online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Public health paternalism—a response to Nys.Stephen Holland - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (3):285-293.
Choosing Health and the inner citadel.P. Allmark - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (1):3-6.
Public health paternalism: Continuing the dialogue.Thomas Nys - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (3):294-298.
Is Obesity a Public Health Problem?Jonny Anomaly - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (3):216-221.
What is public opinion?Eric R. A. N. Smith - 1996 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 10 (1):95-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
34 (#434,396)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations