Some remarks on indicative conditionals
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
We will look at several theories of indicative conditionals grouped into three categories: those that base its semantics on its logical counterpart (the material conditional); intensional analyses, which bring in alternative possible worlds; and a third subgroup which denies that indicative conditionals express propositions at all. We will also look at some problems for each kind of approach.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The counterfactual direct argument.Simon Goldstein - 2020 - Linguistics and Philosophy 43 (2):193-232.
The C3 Conditional: A Variably Strict Ordinary-Language Conditional.Monique Whitaker - 2016 - Dissertation, CUNY
The Lost Pillar of Deontic Modality (Part of the Dissertation Portfolio Modality, Names and Descriptions).Zsófia Zvolenszky - 2007 - Dissertation, New York University
'Deduction' Versus 'Inference' and the Denotation of Conditional Sentences.Carsten Breul - manuscript
Similar books and articles
Defending a Possible-Worlds Account of Indicative Conditionals.Daniel Nolan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (3):215-269.
Indicative and Subjunctive Conditionals.Brian Weatherson - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (203):200-216.
Subjunctive Biscuit and Stand-Off Conditionals.Eric Swanson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-05-02
Total views
167 ( #71,151 of 2,518,020 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,518,020 )
2010-05-02
Total views
167 ( #71,151 of 2,518,020 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #409,045 of 2,518,020 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
