Aaron Rizzieri
Yavapai College
Joan Mcgregor
Arizona State University
The left ventricular assist device was originally designed to be surgically implanted as a bridge to transplantation for patients with chronic end-stage heart failure. On the basis of the REMATCH trial, the US Food and Drug Administration and the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services approved permanent implantation of the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy in Medicare beneficiaries who are not candidates for heart transplantation. The use of the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy raises certain ethical challenges. Left ventricular assist devices can prolong the survival of average recipients compared with optimal medical management of chronic end-stage heart failure. However, the overall quality of life can be adversely affected in some recipients because of serious infections, neurologic complications, and device malfunction. Left ventricular assist devices alter end-of-life trajectories. The caregivers of recipients may experience significant burden (e.g., poor physical health, depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder) from destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices. There are also social and financial ramifications for recipients and their families. We advocate early utilization of a palliative care approach and outline prerequisite conditions so that consenting for the use of a left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy is a well informed process. These conditions include: (1) direct participation of a multidisciplinary care team, including palliative care specialists, (2) a concise plan of care for anticipated device-related complications, (3) careful surveillance and counseling for caregiver burden, (4) advance-care planning for anticipated end-of-life trajectories and timing of device deactivation, and (5) a plan to address the long-term financial burden on patients, families, and caregivers. Short-term mechanical circulatory devices (e.g. percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass, percutaneous ventricular assist devices, etc.) can be initiated in emergency situations as a bridge to permanent implantation of ventricular assist devices in chronic end-stage heart failure. In the absence of first-person (patient) consent, presumed consent or surrogate consent should be used cautiously for the initiation of short-term mechanical circulatory devices in emergency situations as a bridge to permanent implantation of left ventricular assist devices. Future clinical studies of destination therapy with left ventricular assist devices should include measures of recipients' quality of end-of-life care and caregivers' burden
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1747-5341-3-20
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

“Doctor, Will You Turn Off My LVAD?”.Jeremy R. Simon & Ruth L. Fischbach - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):14-15.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Prolegomena to Any Future Mereology of the Body.Edward Fried - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (5):359-384.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Left Ventricular Assist Devices: An Ethical Analysis.Katrina A. Bramstedt - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):89-96.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
What Diagnostic Devices Do: The Case of Blood Sugar Measurement.Annemaire Mol - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):9-22.
Devices and Educational Change.Jan Nespor - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (S1):15-37.


Added to PP index

Total views
71 ( #165,387 of 2,533,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes